John Spirko, INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT FOR JOHN SPIRKO, Regarding the case of Betty Jane Mottinger , Free John Spirko, Justice For John Spirko
Justice For John Spirko, Lies, Deceit & Deception, Ohio's Justice System


INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT

John Spirko has been on Ohio's death row for the past 22 years for a crime

he did not commit. He was convicted because his trial was Constitionally and

fundamentally flawed: the State failed to disclose exculpatory material

demonstrating the the case it presented to the jury was false and that the State

knew it was false. As Judge Gilman concluded in the dissent, "it leaves me with

considerable doubt as to whether [Spirko] has been lawfully subjected to the death

penalty in light of the state's alleged Brady violation." Spirko v. Mitchell, 368

F.d 603, 614 (6th Cir. 2004) (emphasis added) (attached hereto as Exhibit 1).

In September 1983, the State indicted both Mr. Spirko and Delaney Gibson

for the 1982 kidnapping and murder of Betty Jane Mottinger. In August 1984, the

State tried Mr. Spirko alone (Mr. Gibson was at large at the time), but it presented

a case that Mr. Spirko and Mr. Gibson committed the crime together. The State

offered no physical evidence linking either Mr. Spirko or Mr. Gibson to the crime.

The state relied heavily on Opal Siebert, who lived across the street from the post

office where Mrs. Mottinger worked and testified that she was "100% sure" that

she saw a clean-shaven Mr. Gibson, identified from a photo spread, in front of the

post office shortly before Mrs. Mottinger was kidnapped. Id. at 616. To link Mr.

- 1 -

NEXT PAGE

Email: Tracy, John Spirko's Representative

Webmaster: Vikki Shaw

© John Spirko
All Rights Reserved

John Spirko's Web Counter